Onshore Vs Offshore Wind Power: Need To Know For 2020 – TheEnergyFix

Onshore Vs Offshore Wind Power: Need To Know For 2021


When it comes to renewable energy sources, wind power is one of the most natural, affordable, and dependable. It is also one of the most environmentally friendly. Wind energy was one of the first sources of renewable energy, and it has a few advantages over other clean sources of energy in that it has fewer limitations.

Up until the last decade, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Germany, Sweden, and the Netherlands were the world leaders in wind energy generation. Now that more countries, such as the United States, are considering the advantages of this technology, the world wind market has 650.8 GW of installed capacity in the current year, with 9.17 percent of this total capacity installed in the previous year.

The question that comes to mind when thinking about wind power is: which is better, solar power or wind power? What is the difference between onshore and offshore wind? It’s critical to determine which one provides the most cost-effective performance for each specific location in order to maximize efficiency. Onshore energy requires wind turbines to be installed on land and harnessed to generate electricity, whereas offshore energy necessitates the installation of wind farms over open seawater in order to take advantage of stronger winds and generate electricity.

Similarities Between Onshore vs Offshore Wind Power

In the United States, wind power generation, both onshore and offshore, is one of the most prominent technologies for generating clean energy. Both sources of energy help to reduce the carbon footprint of the environment while also providing clean and renewable energy to the power grid.

Despite the fact that offshore wind turbines are significantly larger in size than onshore wind turbines, both operate on the same mechanical principle to generate wind energy. Regardless of the application, the turbines are made up of rotor blades that revolve around a horizontal hub. A lift motion is created by the wind passing through the blade, which is then used by an asynchronous generator to complete a complex process that ultimately results in the generation of electricity.

Because of installation materials and other factors, offshore wind farms are more expensive. However, the materials used in both turbines are essentially the same, with offshore turbines requiring only minor variations to ensure safety in the presence of higher wind speeds than onshore wind farms. Both onshore and offshore technologies could potentially produce the same amount of energy if two turbines of similar size were exposed to the same wind speeds, with the difference in output energy being close to zero for both.

Differences Between Onshore vs Offshore Wind Power

Even though onshore and offshore wind power generation share some characteristics, such as the use of wind to generate energy, they also differ in a number of ways. For the most part, the only difference between onshore and offshore wind is the location of where the turbines must be installed. Onshore wind farms are those that are built on land, whereas offshore wind farms are those that are built in large bodies of water.

Because onshore wind farms are built on land, they have the potential to be significantly less expensive than the alternative. Offshore wind farms necessitate the construction of platforms, underwater cables, interconnection, and other factors that raise the cost of installation; maintenance of these farms necessitates the transportation of employees by helicopter or vessel.

Onshore wind power generation can be less predictable than offshore wind power generation. Terrain analysis and wind current studies are required before onshore wind farms can be properly installed to provide sustainable clean energy generation. The consistent winds at higher speeds at offshore farms reduce the amount of troublesome inconsistency that offshore farms experience, resulting in more reliable and efficient power generation.

Onshore Wind Review

Onshore wind energy is a relatively inexpensive source of energy. Offshore farms have lower installation costs because they do not require as much additional infrastructure for energy transmission. By 2020, onshore wind prices could be as low as 20 cents per megawatt hour (MWh). According to current estimates, energy costs will be even lower in 2030 than they were in 2018, due to the installation of three times as many onshore wind farms as there were in 2018.

Space required

For example, one disadvantage of onshore wind farms is that they require the use of land space to be installed while also producing clean energy. Onshore wind turbines require a minimum distance of 150 meters from any obstructions and a separation between turbines equal to seven times the diameter of the rotor in order to ensure an uninterrupted flow of air, which is necessary for power generation.


Onshore wind is one of the most widely used sources of renewable energy in the United States. Due to the nature of wind energy generation and in comparison to offshore wind power, the technology offers numerous advantages.

  • It has lower installation costs than other options. In some cases, the payback period for an investment can be as short as two years.
  • The generated energy can be easily connected to the power grid.
  • Onshore farm installation is becoming more popular among businesses.
  • The cost of maintenance can be quite low in some cases.


Onshore wind farms have some disadvantages, as can be expected with anything that isn’t entirely positive.

  • Onshore wind farms, as opposed to offshore wind farms, necessitate a more thorough analysis of wind currents and speeds in order to provide high-efficiency generation without interruption.
  • Due to the high cost of land and the possibility of urban expansion, available space may be more limited.
  • The level of dissatisfaction among the general public as a result of visual and auditory pollution caused by onshore wind farms in close proximity to residential areas can be quite high.

Offshore Wind Review


Costs for offshore wind installations can be up to 20% higher than those for onshore installations, owing to the need for additional transmission infrastructure, the use of more expensive materials, and other technical challenges. By 2019, offshore wind power costs are expected to be 32 percent lower than in 2018, with generation costs estimated to be 78 dollars per megawatt hour (MWh). The cost of offshore wind energy may be comparable to that of fossil fuels by the year 2038, according to projections.

Space required

Offshore wind energy generation does not present a problem in terms of the amount of space required for the installation of wind farms. The minimum distance required for offshore farms is at least 200 nautical miles from the shore and at least 50 feet below the surface of the ocean floor. The power density of offshore turbines oscillates around one, necessitating the use of two for a two-megawatt turbine.


Even though onshore wind farms appear to be the most popular option at the moment, offshore wind farms have a number of significant advantages over their onshore counterparts.

  • The fact that installations are more suitable for larger areas means that they present opportunities for large-scale renewable energy generation projects.
  • Offshore wind farms have a greater potential for power generation than onshore wind farms because the winds are faster and more consistent, and they also provide energy at a more stable rate.
  • As opposed to onshore wind farms, there are no visual or noise pollution drawbacks associated with offshore wind farms.
  • Due to the fact that noise pollution is not an issue with offshore wind turbines, they can be twice or three times larger than their onshore counterparts. This increased size results in greater power generation and greater efficiency for the same amount of material.
  • Because there is no interference with land terrains, it is possible to make better use of available space in densely populated areas.


Offshore wind farms have a variety of advantages, such as lowering public health costs and ensuring clean, renewable energy production. However, there are some drawbacks to using this technology as well.

  • In the case of onshore wind power, the costs of installation and transmission are more expensive.
  • Underwater noises and turbines can have an impact on the fauna that lives near bodies of water and can even kill migrating birds as a result of the impact.
  • With the passage of time, offshore wind farms require maintenance that is both more difficult and more expensive to perform.
  • The time it takes to restore energy after a malfunction in an offshore wind farm can be longer than with an onshore wind farm.

Conclusion: Onshore vs Offshore Wind, Which Is Best?

Because of the actual costs of generation and installation, onshore wind power is a significantly better option than offshore wind power. However, since 2008, offshore wind investments have increased significantly, resulting in a wind scenario for 2030 that outperforms onshore technologies and increases potential installed capacity in Europe by up to 70GW.

Even though onshore wind power generation is expected to be significantly less expensive than offshore by 2020, it is not the only viable option due to the numerous drawbacks. There is visual and noise pollution, low wind reliability, and high land-space costs as a result of these factors. Offshore wind generation outperforms onshore technology in a variety of ways, ensuring a clean, renewable energy source that does not pollute the environment while also generating at a high rate on a consistent basis due to offshore winds.

While the trending balance may be tilted in favor of onshore wind in 2020, this may not be the case in the years to come. Investments in offshore wind farms are increasing, and costs will eventually fall to the point where they will be competitive with, if not cheaper than, fossil and natural gas generation in the future. Despite the fact that offshore wind power is currently the most expensive source of energy, it is the most promising option for the future of the global wind market.